Up next in 10
The Outer Worlds 2 - Endpoint's End: Deal With Anchorite Brun (Speech 14) | Gas The Test Chamber
Nov 13, 2025
Join Us https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCBcxJDhzD5N2wl7L8etoflw/join
Website https://jasonsvideogamessource.com/
Discord https://discord.gg/D9yVCsSnaf
Reddit https://www.reddit.com/r/JVGS/
X https://twitter.com/JasonVGS
The Outer Worlds 2 - Endpoint's End: Deal With Anchorite Brun (Speech 14) | Gas The Test Chamber
Show More Show Less View Video Transcript
0:29
There you are. You saw the experiment
0:32
through to the end. Yes. The data hasn't
0:34
arrived yet, so please do tell. Was it
0:37
as beautiful as I imagined? Any inklings
0:40
to the result? Or perhaps I oughtn't to
0:43
have recoisted myself till after the
0:45
experiment concluded? H Well, don't just
0:48
stand there. Tell me. Tell me
0:50
everything.
1:09
some issues.
1:12
You seem like softening the blow. Was
1:14
there a malfunction? Was there some
1:18
error in the calculations?
1:22
Wait,
1:24
wait.
1:26
Let's start from the beginning. Step me
1:29
through your understanding of what's
1:30
gone arry.
1:44
Really? In what way?
2:16
Did Sier Balt fail to explain?
2:20
Using her theorem, we can map the
2:22
position and path of every atom in a
2:24
simulated universe, then extrapolate
2:27
that to solve the equation. This was
2:30
just a start. Such models typically make
2:33
an enormous amount of errors at first.
2:36
All quite expected, an anticipated
2:39
setback, nothing more. It simply needs
2:41
to be revised and refined. You certainly
2:44
seem to be making a lot out of this,
2:46
though, one must say.
3:06
Now, now I'm starting to believe you're
3:08
just needlessly fretting. Is this
3:11
nerves? I'm sorry. I don't mean to be
3:14
dismissive. Look, there may be some
3:16
validity to some of your points. Yes.
3:19
But we'll improve. We will continue to
3:22
stride forward. There's absolutely no
3:25
need for all this doom and gloom.
3:39
Oh, is one of you a seer now? Because I
3:42
put considerable more stock in the
3:44
prognostications of the order's prime
3:46
mathematicians than I do any old
3:48
run-of-the-mill soothsayer. Now, is that
3:51
all? Because I think I've had enough of
3:53
all this. Everything we've done here is
3:55
built off Seir Balt's research, which is
3:57
quite brilliant.
4:10
Really? Will I become a laughingstock
4:12
among my peers? Have the whispered
4:14
cheers begun already? No. No. Calm down.
4:20
Breathe. You faced dead setbacks before.
4:24
Ah, the experiment data just arrived in
4:27
my terminal. Allow me to eyeball it a
4:29
moment. Perhaps there's something here
4:31
to help prove or disprove any of what
4:34
you've been saying.
4:37
There was some variance to the input
4:39
data. Not far beyond acceptable
4:42
parameters, but curious could explain
4:45
the failure.
5:05
Oh, come. One bad test wouldn't mean the
5:08
science is completely flawed. I fear
5:11
this was a waste of valuable time. If I
5:14
may, I have a point I'd like to add.
5:19
There's a critical flaw in Sir Bold's
5:22
approach. I think best illustrated by
5:24
this English phrase. Time flies like an
5:27
arrow. Fruit flies like a banana. I much
5:31
appreciate this gest. Very simple yet
5:34
clever. Because in English the word like
5:36
can mean similar to or I prefer and
5:39
flies can be trous or plural of the
5:43
insect. Through this perspective it
5:45
functions makes sense is humorous even
5:48
but in another language where words
5:50
meanings differ slightly. It does not.
5:53
The framework we interpret the statement
5:55
from changes thus rendering it
5:57
uninterpretable.
5:59
False. BJold's method of shortcutting
6:02
the universal equation is much the same.
6:06
It lacks context. When you extrapolate
6:09
the data from the mini universe to the
6:11
larger one, the information itself may
6:14
scale correctly but fail to interrelate.
6:17
This has been a difficult conversation,
6:20
challenging, disputatious, at times
6:24
compelling. Yet I remain unsuayed.
6:28
We tried. Our fallback plans our only
6:30
option now. Head for the hatch.
6:32
What was that? You're starting to worry
6:34
me. What do you intend to do?
7:04
Ah the experiment data just arrived.
7:07
There was some variance to the input
7:09
data. Not far beyond acceptable
7:12
parameters but c oh come come one. Ah
7:17
the there was some variance to the
7:19
input. I believe I followed that. But
7:22
but Oh, come come. What?
8:34
Fellow scholars of the order, a tragic
8:38
accident has occurred. During our recent
8:41
experiment in test chamber beta, we
8:44
failed to recognize that ventilation
8:47
systems had been left connected to test
8:49
chamber alpha. As you know, it had been
8:52
recently refurbished as an enclosure for
8:54
Anchor is from. She gave her life for
8:58
science. Well, it it's true that we
9:01
found the related research deeply
9:03
flawed, but she gave her life for the
9:06
pursuit of science. As the experiment
9:10
was a colossal failure, I as senior
9:13
scientists remaining have deter
9:17
determined we must aband
9:21
shut down the program.
9:34
I understand now why they say never meet
9:36
your heroes. Intercessor Delgado, you've
9:39
truly been an enormous disappointment. A
9:42
key experiment fails and Anchor Brun
9:44
falls prey to an unfortunate accident
9:47
right after you and your consort arrive.
9:50
And we are all to believe these events
9:52
are unrelated. That's circumstantial and
9:55
more than a might bit paranoid. I expect
9:57
better from an order scientism.
10:03
Don't think I don't see your handprints
10:05
all over this Delgato.
#Games
#Computer & Video Games